|
All images © Bob Atkins
This website is hosted by:
|
 Author
|
Topic: Do I REALLY Need Both Lenses? (Read 4935 times)
|
bogino
Newbie
Posts: 9
|
Not too long ago I went on a bit of a binge in terms of buying lenses. My question is this: I have a Canon 60mm Macro and not too long after that I got the Canon 100mm Macro. I am by no means a "professional" photographer but when I'm traveling to Costa Rica, besides taking pictures of wildlife I also enjor taking pictures of nice flowers, orchids etc. So...do I REALLY need both of these lenses? Thx.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KeithB
|
No, but for flowers the 60mm would be fine and is a lot smaller and lighter. (unless your 100mm is the one with IS, that makes the decision much harder. I would take just the 100mm IS and leave the 60mm home.)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bogino
Newbie
Posts: 9
|
The 100mm is the one with IS. Thanks for your input.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Atkins
|
I'd take the 100/2.8 IS. There's really nothing that to 60 can do that the 100IS can't do (and do better).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
