The Canon EOS and Photography Forums

I read on a photography site that using a circular polarizing filter with an ultra-wide lens such as the Canon EF 10-22 mm lens could cause problems with proper colour rendering and distortion, especially at the wide end of the range.

I would like to request some views on this as I was considering buying this lens and also a polarizing filter.  ???

The main problem of polarizers on ultawide lenses is an uneven rendering of the sky. This is because the polarization of the sky is not uniform. It's most polarized at 90 degrees to the position of the sun. So a very wide view of the sky with a polarizer may make it a deep blue in one part of the image (wher it is most strongly polarized) and pale blue in others (where it's weakly polarized)..

If the sky isn't in the image then there is generally no problem. It certainly will not cause distortion (assuming you buy a decent polarizer and not one costing $5 from China via eBay!). It really won't cause any color shifts either other than increasing saturation of some colors (which is presumably why you are using it anyway). Some polarizers on some ultrawide lenses might cause minor vignetting in the corners of the image, but that's lens and polarizer specific. There are "ultra slim" polarizers designed to minimize this effect, but they are more expensive and not required with most lenses.

The best polarizers are probably the B+W ones like this - B+W 77mm Circular Polarizer with Multi-Resistant Coating (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000BZLAD/bobatkinsphotogr)

The milticoated Hoya is also excellent - Hoya 77mm HD  8-layer Multi-Coated Circular Polarizer (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B001G7PMGS/bobatkinsphotogr)

Less expensive, but still good and still multicoated are the Hoya Alpha line of filters like this one - Hoya 77mm Alpha Circular Polarizer (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B009IYBR56/bobatkinsphotogr)

It's not worth buying really cheap polarizers. They tend to be uncoated and some can also soften the image.

There is an example of the color variation on this page:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/filters.htm

It should be simple enough to take some test images to see how wide you can go without severe effects.

It's hard to give definitive limits because it depends on the part of the sky you are looking at and the degree of polarization you dial in and is influenced by things like the presence of clouds and large bodies of water which reflect sunlight. It also depends on the time of day and a bunch of other factors (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_sky_model). So you can't say that using a lens with a field of view greater than X degrees is a problem because X isn't constant. However the wider the lens is, the more likely it is that uneven sky polarization can be an issue.

It's not something to worry about too much, but it's something to be aware of and to watch for when shooting. Polarizers are useful for things other than just darkening the sky, so a polarizer is still very useful on an ultra wide lens. They can reduce glare from water, saturate colors and even act as an ND filter if you need longer exposure times (e.g. when photographing flowing water).

Bob, I think you have summed it up very well - polarisers can be very useful as long as we are aware of the problems that can come up while using them.

Thanks to you and to everyone else for throwing a lot of light on the issue.