The Canon EOS and Photography Forums

Photography Forums => The Canon EOS Forum => Topic started by: bmpress on January 14, 2016, 09:55:10 AM



Title: Second Body v. Extender
Post by: bmpress on January 14, 2016, 09:55:10 AM
Hi Bob,

So now I have 5d III and 100-400 ii.... I gave up my Tamron 150-600 as it was too heavy.

The question is what to do about shooting birds. Would you suggest an extender over a second APC body and if not, then which body to get?

I looked at the Rebels and liked their weight. The 70d seems much better, but then again, it is heavier and costly. In fact it is not much less than a 7d ii in price.

Glad you are back in the saddle...

Thanks,

Barry


Title: Re: Second Body v. Extender
Post by: KeithB on January 14, 2016, 02:29:42 PM
I don't know whether you use it, but the Rebels do not have focus micro-adjustment, which I would think would be important to a birder.


Title: Re: Second Body v. Extender
Post by: bmpress on January 15, 2016, 09:18:36 AM
Good point...thanks.


Title: Re: Second Body v. Extender
Post by: Bob Atkins on January 15, 2016, 05:23:23 PM
Given that you have the 5D MkIII and 100-400, your cheapest and lightest route to a longer lens is an extender like the Canon 1.4x. That will still give you AF (with the center focus zone) at f8 and you'll be at 540mm at full zoom.

You can get a used MkI  for under $100 or a used MkII for under $200  from Adorama (http://www.adorama.com/searchsite/default.aspx?searchinfo=canon+1.4x+extender&category=1000100&kbid=12417).  A new  MkIII extender will cost you $429  (http://www.adorama.com/CA14XAF3U.html?kbid=12417).

However looked without regard for you current gear, and assuming you wanted maximum reach, I'd have suggested anEOS 7D MkI or EOS 70D and a Sigma or Tamron 150-600/5-6.3. Probably the Sigma because it will take the Canon TCs (using Live View AF or MF). Useful for perched birds, not birds in flight!

With your current setup you could still go with an APSC body if the cost and weight aren't prohibitive. I'd go that route over the 5D MkIII and TC since you'll have better AF, more AF points and be at an effective 640mm f5.6. A little more noise maybe if you're shooting at high ISO but I think the images would likely be better than using the 1.4x on the 5D MkII, and with the 5D MkII you can still use the 1.4x TC and get center zone AF at an effective 896mm f8. If the weight is too much, you could always leave the 5D MkIII at home if you know you're mainly going to be doing long telephoto shots!

You can get a  7D MkII (open box) for $1250 ir a new one for $1500 (http://www.adorama.com/l/Cameras/Digital-SLR-Cameras?sf=Price&sel=Model_Canon-7D-Mark-II&term=canon+eos+7d+mark+ii&kbid=12417)  or a 70D from $799  (http://www.adorama.com/l/Cameras/Digital-SLR-Cameras?sf=Price&sel=Model_Canon-7D-Mark-II&term=canon+eos+7d+mark+ii&kbid=12417)

It's generally true that an APSC body will be better than an Full frame body + TC for long telephoto readch, assuming that low noise at higher ISO settings isn't the deciding factor.

So my kit for telephoto shots of small subjects would probably be the 7D MkII, a Sigma 150-600 - and a used MkI or Mkll 14x TC for when my subject was sitting still!

The one advantage of the Canon 100-400 MkII is that the AF may be faster and more accurate when tracking birds in flight than a 3rd party lens. But I'd still put it on a 7D MkII.

A lightweight Rebel body is also an option, but you're out of luck if you demand AF microadjust. The 70D has it, but none of the rebels be. The Sigam 150-600 has it though, via the Sigma USB Dock (see http://bobatkins.com/photography/reviews/sigma_usb_dock.html)

There are so many options here, it's hard to pick one, but going back to my opening comment, with the gear you have, I'd go with a used Canon 1.4x TC and soo how that works out. It's light and it's relatively cheap. If it doesn't do the job, then you can consider other options.


Title: Re: Second Body v. Extender
Post by: bmpress on January 16, 2016, 08:26:41 AM
Thanks for your analysis, Bob. I am going to find a used 7d II.

But as a follow-up question, will an old Tamron 1.4 Extender work with my 5d iii and 100-400 II?


Title: Re: Second Body v. Extender
Post by: Bob Atkins on January 17, 2016, 11:33:28 AM
I see no reason why it wouldn't. I have an old Tamron 1.4x myself and it words fine with my 6D, 7D and 70D as well as all my Canon and 3rd party lenses. The optics are slightly smaller, so I think there's more vignetting when used with long telephotos on a full frame camera. I've had good luck with my Tamron 1.4x on a Canon 500/4.5L and even get AF with bodies that don't support AF slower than f5.6. I don't think it slows down AF like the Canon TCs do, which has resulted in it "hunting" for focus under some conditions where the Canon 1.4x had no trouble. The Canon TCs do slow down focus for more reliable AF.

Adorama gave a couple of  used 7D MkII bodies (http://www.adorama.com/l/Used/Cameras/Canon~Digital-SLR-Cameras?sel=Model_Canon-7D-Mark-II&kbid=12417). Don't know how their prices compare with an
EOS 7D MkII on eBay (http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=9&pub=5574673508&toolid=10001&campid=5335918830&customid=&icep_uq=eos+7D+Mkii&icep_sellerId=&icep_ex_kw=&icep_sortBy=12&icep_catId=31388&icep_minPrice=&icep_maxPrice=&ipn=psmain&icep_vectorid=229466&kwid=902099&mtid=824&kw=lg) for items of the same age/cendition, but you do get a 90 day warranty and a 30 day "no questions asked" return policy, something you don't usually get form a private sale. The EX+ one at $999 sounds like a decent deal. If I didn't already have too many DSLR bodies, I might be tempted myself! Maybe if I sold my 7D MkI...........