The Canon EOS and Photography Forums

Hi there, I was searching amazon and I am not sure which UV filter size is suitable for the EF 100mm f.2.8 L IS USM?  is it the Canon 58 mm?? I also need to know about the hood, since I've never tried one before is it goingto fit well with the UV filter...and if there is no problem, is it theET-73??

Thank You

You can find information on the 100/2.8L IS macro in the EOS Lens Database here:

http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/eflenses/lens_data.php?ID=142

It takes a 67mm filter and the ET-73 lens hood. The hood should fit fine over the filter.


I'd go with the  Hoya 67mm Super Multi-coated UV filter (http://www.adorama.com/Refby.tpl?refby=rflAID012417&sku=HY67UVSM) as being the best compromise of quality and price. You certainly need a multicoated filter to maximize the image quality of that lens.

If you want the "ultimate" filter, look at the Hoya hardened 8 layer multicoated UV filter (67)mm  (http://www.adorama.com/Refby.tpl?refby=rflAID012417&sku=HY67UVHD). It's not that much more expensive.

When you purchase an "L" lens, like the EF 100f/2.8L, the lens hood will be included as part of the purchase and is packed with the lens.

Thank you both for replying!  well about the hood, I was told that it comes with it, well it did not come with my 28-135mm :)

Concerning the filters, I guess if the price won't be a lot higher, then I'll get the last one you've suggested Bob ...Thank You

All "L" series lenses that can be fitted with a hood are supplied with a hood in the box (and sometimes a case).

I don't think any Canon non-L lenses are supplied with a hood included, hence your 28-135 would not have come with one.

You can save a few bucks if you go with a multi-coated Hoya clear protection filter rather than a UV. Although UV filters for film were somewhat useful for long distant shots they have no role that I'm aware of for digital. Sensors are just not sensitive to UV light as film was or is.

Thank you whizkid for ur info. :)