All images © Bob Atkins

7.jpg

This website is hosted by:
Host Unlimited Domains on 1 Account

16.jpg

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
Web www.bobatkins.com
*
+  The Canon EOS and Photography Forums
|-+  Photography Forums
| |-+  The Canon EOS Forum
| | |-+  Tamron SP AF 1.4X and Canon 40D
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Tamron SP AF 1.4X and Canon 40D  (Read 8947 times)  bookmark this topic!
canoeracer
Newbie
*
Posts: 2


Tamron SP AF 1.4X and Canon 40D
« on: November 09, 2008, 12:55:19 PM »

I recently purchased a new Tamron SP AF 1.4X teleconverter.  When used with my 40D, it does not recognize a Canon EF 100mm f/2 lens.  It does, however, meter correctly on my Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L.   Is this normal?   Tamron claims it works with lenses >90mm and f/4 or faster.

Thanks
Logged
Bob Atkins
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1253


Re: Tamron SP AF 1.4X and Canon 40D
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2008, 03:27:48 PM »

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "recognize" in this context.

The Tamron 1.4x should work with any lens, i.e. it should give you the correct exposure (even though the indicated aperture may be off by a stop).

I've used a Tamron 1.4x with lenses from 50mm to 600mm and it's "worked" with all of them. Sometimes I've used a little exposure compensation with some camera bodies to get the exposure I liked best, but by and large exposure has been pretty accurate and normally no compensation is needed. I haven't used it with the 100/2 because I don't have one, but I can see no reason at all why there should be a problem.
Logged
canoeracer
Newbie
*
Posts: 2


Re: Tamron SP AF 1.4X and Canon 40D
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2008, 05:54:28 AM »

By recognize I mean the camera body still sets the lowest aperture to 2.0 on the Canon 100mm, rather than the anticipated 2.8.   When I use the 70-200 f/4, the aperture shifts to f/5.6.   The pictures I take even with the 100mm at any available aperture are under exposed using the 1.4x.   Also, as I understand other reports, the Exif data should indicate that a converter is being used.   This does not happen.

Any further thoughts?    Do you think the converter is defective?

Thanks
Logged
Pages: [1]    
Print
« previous next »
Jump to: