All images © Bob Atkins

17.jpg

This website is hosted by:
Host Unlimited Domains on 1 Account

4.jpg

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
Web www.bobatkins.com
*
+  The Canon EOS and Photography Forums
|-+  Photography Forums
| |-+  The Canon EOS Forum
| | |-+  Should I Use a Flash for Nature Photography?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Should I Use a Flash for Nature Photography?  (Read 8713 times)  bookmark this topic!
427l
Newbie
*
Posts: 6


Should I Use a Flash for Nature Photography?
« on: January 03, 2009, 10:40:46 PM »

I typically shoot wildlife at distances greater than 50ft, will a external flash really do anything for me? Aside from that I was thinking an external flash may be handy especially for the occasional people shots - was looking into a speedlite 430EX II. Any one have any comments on this or whether I should look for the 580EX II? I've been using the pop up on my 40D but saw the results from some of my nikon-shooting family members this past christmas and thought maybe I should get a flash.
Logged
Bob Atkins
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1253


Re: Should I Use a Flash for Nature Photography?
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2009, 08:34:43 PM »

An external flash is sometimes useful for fill purposes when shooting in bright daylight, but images shot using flash as the main source of illumination don't usually look very good.

You can extend the range of external flash units by using something like the Better Beamer. This narrows the flash beam and extends the range for use with telephoto lenses.
Logged
KeithB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 543


Re: Should I Use a Flash for Nature Photography?
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2009, 02:00:00 PM »

Here is a review of the Better Beamer:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/better_beamer.shtml

Even if it does nothing but put some catch-light in the eyes, it can really improve a photograph.
Logged
Pages: [1]    
Print
« previous next »
Jump to: