I know you are all tired of this subject, but I have to go here. I have money to buy a 40D with the kit lens or the XSi with kit lens and ONE other lens. So, 40D with ONE lens or XSI with TWO lenses. It seems to me that the 28-135 is better than the 18-55, but then it nullifies the 70-200 because of the overlap in length.
I currently photograph:
waterfalls, wildlife (squirrels, prairie dogs, etc), portraits, and flowers.
I am struggling between 10-22, 50mm Macro, 70-200L (non-IS), and the 70-300IS
I rarely do sports photography. Weight is a consideration.
You can see some of what I do on Myspace.
www.myspace.com/willterrellphotography. I want to expand what I can do.
My thinking: 10-22 will let me get the Texas landscapes I love. 50mm Macro will let me get flowers and portraits. 70-200 and 70-300 will let me get closer to wildlife.
Thanks!!!!!
PS. I am currently using a Canon S500 from 2004, so anything is a huge upgrade.