Bob,
I have just been reading two of your excellent articles. This one
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/digital/full_frame_vs_aps-c.html and this one
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/digital/size_matters.htmlYou wrote...
larger sensors work on the upper part of the MTF curve of a lens, while smaller sensors work on a lower part of the curve...and you compared a 12" x18" print from the 20D and the 5D and said PPI would be respectively 195 and 243.
I understand this is about pixel size and enlargement factor.
I don´t understand all the math beneath this so how do I compare the (original) 5D vs the 50D? Will I see any difference in resolution and contrast in an A4 print or do I need to make a larger print, say A3, to see any difference?
Having your articles fresh in mind I again took a closer look at dxomark´s new camera/lens measurement tools. According to them the 50D / 85mm f:1.8 combo should give me 42 lp/mm and a "score" of 12. ( According to dxomark a "score" of 10 correspond to a 30x20cm optimal print )
The 5D / 85mm f:1.8 combo should give me 59 lp/mm or a "score" of 25. ( A "score" of 20 gives an optimal 45x30cm print ) This should give an optimal A3+ print according to dxomark.
What do you think about these numbers? Are they realistic? Will I be able to make larger prints that has better resolution and contrast using the 5D compared to the 50D?
How do I calculate print resolution by the way? In one of the articles you mentioned a 4.8 lp/mm print from the 5D vs 3.85 lp/mm print from the 20D.